Jump to content

Byron Nash

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Byron Nash reacted to davpe in New user questions - versioning, editing and reviewing uploaded content   
    Hi, 
    I'm currently evaluating Ftrack Studio to se whether it is a viable option for our needs (commercials VFX, ~50 ppl).  Right now we're using our own production tracking
    We like how Ftrack is much more easy to read and faster to navigate than Shotgun, and in general we really like it. However, there are a few essential things that make us sad and confused. It's possible we're just overlooking something. Would you guys be so kind and provide some answers for us?
    1. versioning
    Honestly, versioning system is a single thing that bugs me the most about Ftrack so far.  Say I've got an Asset build with a some tasks in it. If I upload multiple files into a task, that don't have the same file names, they end up being multiple different objects inside of a single task, instead of multiple versions of the same object. At first I thought I'm doing something wrong but this seems to be a way how it actually works. If the file name is different, it's not the same thing. This behaviour is a source of confusion, and definitely not what we want. The fact is, in our envionment (especially in concepting and modelling stage) people often want to just quickly upload a screen grab or something, for a review. These files have random names and we don't really need or want to build a system to keep it consistent. If it's in the same task, we always want to consider it as a version of the same thing. The idea of having multiple elements in the same task is interesting, but the fact it's decided by a file name whether it is a new thing or a version, seems very restrictive. Even in late stages, like lighting, we want to be able to have some dynamic strings embedded in a file name (like "half-res", or something), and still be able to treat it as a version rather than a separate element. Is there a way to go around this? How do you guys treat versions? 
    2. editing uploaded content
    Another thing that feels quite inconvenient is once you upload a file, you don't seem to be able to edit it. During our test drive it often happened that people uploaded their files in a wrong place (like Asset Build root instead of a Task), and we wanted to move it afterwards. Unfortunately, we couldn't find a way how to do it, other than deleting the entry and ask the artist to upload it again. This is, of course, an another source of confusion and review delays. Are we missing something here?
    3. reviews
    What we'd like to do pretty often, is to review and compare everything that's been added to a Task (or Asset, Shot, etc...), let's say yesterday. So I tried to add a Task to a List, expecting to be able to define some filters. Haven't been given any options. Fair enough, I thought perhaps it just lists everything in that Task and I'll be able to filter items by time in Web Player. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work that way either. It only seems to load the latest item in a Task with no way to bring the rest of the stuff other than manually adding it to the List. I think this mostly comes back to the versioning system that doesn't fit to our way of working. Time filtering (thou limited) seems to be possible only for Versions, as well as other handy things like Related versions and comparison tools, which are kinda useless to us. This way reviewing becomes kind of disorderly. Any thoughts?
    4. Not working with exr?
    Hard to believe. Is it really not possible to use exr files with Ftrack?
    5. simplified artist interface
    By this I mean, is there something like Shotgun Create? Like a Lite version where artists only see their own tasks and notes addressed to them, in much simplified interface? Originaly I thought that's what Ftrack Review is, but it seems to be a separate thing that doesn't talk to Studio version.
    Thanks to anybody who did it all the way through that pile of text :) Many thanks for any responses.
    Cheers,
    David 
  2. Like
    Byron Nash reacted to finnjaegger in Custom Folder structures/Filenaming   
    Only found some old posts regarding this, I really dislike the way ftrack names files and creates folders, and I want to customize where stuff goes and how stuff is named after publishing . Is this still not possible without having to code my own publishing tools e.t.c? 
    one example, I publish stuff and it doesnt have the version number in the filename, only in parent folder, if I want to send those to clients how will anyone know what version is what? I guess I could create my own send to client action that copies stuff to place X and renames it , but jeez.  this seems like a no-brainer to be able to customize stuff? what am I missing? 
×
×
  • Create New...