Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'review'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Company news
    • General announcements
  • ftrack Studio (main app)
    • General discussion
    • Feature requests
    • API
    • Help
    • Actions and Widgets
    • ftrack Go
  • ftrack Review
    • General discussion
    • Feature requests
    • Help
  • Connect and plugins
    • General discussion
    • Connect package releases
    • Feature requests
    • Help
    • Connect plugins releases
  • Advisory Forum
  • Tech preview
    • API
    • New integrations
    • Studio overview
    • ftrack Review

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 13 results

  1. It would be most useful to be able to have clips plays through when loaded into the client review the same as in Web Player. An option to move to next clip in options drop down, so would have: loop, single play and play next.
  2. Probably a big ask from a technical perspective but an incredibly useful feature in Review would be to wipe between two loaded versions in Ftrack Web Player. If wiping isn't possible, even a key press to quickly switch from version A to version B during playback would be helpful.
  3. Good afternoon, we would like to use the Autodesk RV Player to review AssetVersions linked to a task. These are opened by launching the corresponding hook via web-ui on a selected task. "ftrack_rv_api.py", which comes with the ftrack-plugin for RV, loads two widgets from ftrack (images added as attachments). We noticed, that the 'versions' tab is not showing other versions, if the AssetVersions linked to the task, have different names. As soon as the names is equal and only the 'verion'-field for the AssetVersion differs, the version-field in the RV-widget works as expected. The problem is, that we need our renderings to have the version as part of the filename, resulting in a broken widget, that never shows possible other versions. Is there a way to have assets/assetversions beeing named without our version-tag but the filenames still contain them? So that reviewing with rv would give us a list of versions? We well keep playing around with this, thank you for any hints? Tim
  4. Hi! The main image format we use on our projects is the exr (as a lot of other studios I believe). We also sometimes use tga files too. Unfortunately, it seems that those formats are not compatibles with Ftrack : they have no thumbnails, and they are not playable in reviews. According to this thread and the documentation, the only supported file format are .png and .jpg. Do you think the support of other image format - especially those that are widely used in the industry - could be added to the upcoming functionalities? Thanks!
  5. Hi, if I'm not mistaken (I have made several tests) when playing a version (either by playing it directly on Ftrack on in a session review), the file played in the web player is not the original deposited file but the mp4 preview version encoded by ftrack. I suppose that the aim is to save bandwidth, but this can be inconvenient as a client will not see the original file but a lower quality one. Would this be possible to chose which version is played, both directly in Ftrack and in a client review?
  6. Hi, I have searched trough feature requests on the forum and on trello, but it seems that this feature has never been suggested, so here it is : we would be interested in a way to automatically notify (with an email) our clients when a new file is added to a active client review. If would be ideal if this feature could easily be turned on or off in the right pane of the session (in order not spam clients when adding a lot of files to a session).
  7. It would be easier to select the versions you want and switch to review in web or RV player thought a simple Alt-1 or Alt-2 instead of the current 3 step Right Click, review, Play. I'm also missing a way to update the Version Status in Thumb Layout and not only in Spreadsheet Layout Thnks
  8. Hi We would like to be able to provide the users of the review page, the ability to run some of our actions. It would seem there is no place currently for running actions on either the right hand panel or on multiple selected versions on the bottom panel. Could I request some ability to add user actions here? Thanks Phil
  9. Hi there, Would it be possible to have a VR checkbox in the version viewer and web player to view the uploaded versions(360 mono/stereo, left right/top bottom, stills/footage) in 360?
  10. HI, I have to say that I'm struggling a lot with implementing use of review option inside our studio for Supervisors and for clients as well. Let me first explain a bit how we work at our studio so you get better understanding of my problems. 90% of our workload is TVC. Timeframe for such projects range from 2 days to 3 months, but usually it is around a week to 10 days. Depending on the complexity I divide a commercial on shot and add tasks to those shots. If the project is very simple and done by 1 or 2 people, I usually just add tasks like Compositing, 3d to the root of the project. So my project structure goes from very simple to a complex one with many commercials in a project and a lot of ppl doing it at the same time. Problem starts when I want to review a commercial. Usually there is 1 main online / comp guy that gathers all assets from different shots, puts that into edit and outputs entire commercial at current state. So he uploads the mov file into his task that is one of many. When I review that movie and add notes - all notes land into just that one task, and all other people don't have any idea about them. What would be good is to have an option of each note to redirect it to some other task within the project. 2nd thing is about client review - Our producers use it to gather client feedback on at the end of offline presentation - they upload the movie and do it live with the client on the side. Thing is that since offline is first part of the project quite often you don't have a project structure created by supervisor ( since we don't know exactly whats the brief ). That means that all the feedback and notes cannot be published into ftrack tasks - This is where the "redirect" option would be awesome. Without it our producers have to do it 2-3 times - one for the client, and then later on after the structure is created. Another thing is to be able to change the order of the notes that are added - Sometimes we jump from shot 1 to 9 in notes, then get back and write notes for shot no 2. That way they are not chronological based on edit. That is very hard for our clients to digest, and it would be easier for our artist to dig into if our producers had an option to change the order to correct one.
  11. HI, I've got a problem with some logical usage of ftrack in commercial workflow. Maybe you guys can help me out with that. I cant find a way to do that. Since we do mostly tv commercials - the lifespan of a project is from 3 days to 2-3 months. Sometimes there is just 1 artist needed, other bigger projects require 10+ users. So in easy project I do not divide 1 commercial into more than 1 task - for example ONLINE/COMPOSITING. That is easy to manage, even if we got 2-3 edits in one project I go very small hierarchy. Then when part of the work is finished they guy uploads a video for review under /PROJECT/SEQUENCE/TASK - fe 333_commercial/30s_01/compositing - that is all good. But ... when it comes to a harder project we divide shots on 1 task per shot or even deeper. So there are 5 or more people working on 1 project at the same time. But ... Not all of them create review files since they are working on parts of the image. 1 of them is doing main comp, most of the time the same guy that does the comp for every other shot, and creates WIP version of entire commercial. So the review movie is only in 1 of the tasks for the entire project sequence. The problem is when I review in ftrack review all notes goes only into that one task. How can I propagate the notes - make each note go to corresponding shot / task based only on 1 MOV in review. So the notes gets delivered to right people. It would be best to do it at the time of review - just have an option to override the task target for each note. Another thing that is making me wonder - is there a way to create a default thumbnails based on category of task or name of such task. Is there a way to automatically propagate a thumbnail from shot level to all the tasks that are bellow in hierarchy ? Is there a way to create PDF files from notes with thumbanils in one of the tasks ? I tried to create a task view that will work like that, but could not - only saw 1 note for a task selected. Thanks in advance
  12. Hi! We are currently testing Ftrack in our workflow, and I'm wondering if its possible to publish renders directly from within Hiero for web reviewing? Regards,
  13. HI guys, I've just run into a problem with ftrack revew in that when you draw on a frame and add your comment there's no way to know what frame it was taken from. This is really annoying, especially when you have animation that repeats itself and you don't know what frame the comment came from. I guess there's a few ways to implement this but it's something that has caused confusion with working on a task. Any advice?